| Author |
Message |
UnderOathFreak
Groupie
Joined: Jan-23-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 348
|
 Posted: Nov-17-2009 at 8:59am |
Originally posted by KingofPolyester
I personally don't have a problem with it. It acts in the same way as a label doing a mix cd that is free with purchase of a featured artist. The idea always being that if you give enough free songs away you'll get them interested and they'll check out the rest of the band/artists stuff. Why do you think derek webb at one point made his entire cd "mockingbird" free to download?
Dude but that's the label or the individual artist doing that. They have the rights to the stuff they're putting out there. On the back of every cd it'll say something like "Warning, unauthorized reproduction is a violation of applicable laws." So let me ask you, do you break any other laws, or just ones you won't get caught for?
And I'm not gonna apologize for my other post, because that's exactly how I feel. It wasn't aimed at any one individual, more at the mindset of some of the people on here as a whole...
|
|
"Nothing Stands Between A Man And His Maker"~The Eleventh Hour~August Burns Red
|
IP Logged |
|
-Apollyon-
Jesus Freak
Joined: Nov-17-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 660
|
 Posted: Nov-17-2009 at 5:05pm |
Originally posted by KingofPolyester
Originally posted by UnderOathFreak
The concept really isn't all that hard to understand....
You may or may not have meant it this way, but your comment here comes across as rude and condescending. Not needed really...
I can understand you may be frusterated with the topic, but there is always the option of staying out of the thread, right?
P.S. The definitions were a real nice touch though...thanks
I don't think that UnderOathFreak meant to sound that way. It certainly could be taken that way and there probably is some frustration in it, but I agree with him: the concept of not distributing what doesn't belong to you isn't complex.
It really just boils down to this: just because a musician or a record label passes out stuff does not mean we can do the same. They own the rights to the music; we do not. When we purchase a CD or download a song, we are buying the right to listen to it, not the right to it. We own a copy of the song/album/whatever, but we do not own this intangible thing called a right to do what we want with it.
"Don't burn music to give to others. Don't lend CD's for others to do the same thing. If you sell a CD, delete it from your computer." I'm not telling anyone to do these things, I'm just saying that the law says, and that is not up for debate. Do with that information what you will before the Lord.
|
|
|
IP Logged |
|
AlwaysThinking
Newbie
Joined: May-02-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 59
|
 Posted: Nov-17-2009 at 5:44pm |
Originally posted by GlorytoGod
^ Do you think justifying it that way makes it OK? Just asking, really. Is it right - ethically, legally, and spiritually - to only copy one or two songs instead of a whole album?
Remember - I'm asking and contributing here as a sister in Christ, not as a moderator.
yeah, i get what ur saying -- i guess i just don't have much of a solid opinion on it because i, myself,(and rarely anyone for me) don't do it... i downloaded a file sharing site one time, but felt so guilty about it that i never used it ...
i just don't get the line between burning c.d.'s and dl-ing
|
|
i'm afraid we're all victoms here - underoath
When everything is going wrong, and you seem to be left alone- always know that Jesus is right by your side
|
IP Logged |
|
GlorytoGod
Administrator
Joined: Apr-28-2003
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3338
|
 Posted: Nov-17-2009 at 6:48pm |
|
|
|
Lord, let others see You before they see me.
Note: To e-mail me please use the Contact Form on my "Staff" page (Karen M.) at the bottom of this page (scroll down).
|
IP Logged |
|
guitargeekette
Jesus Freak
Joined: Jan-05-2008
Location: Jamaica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 607
|
 Posted: Nov-17-2009 at 8:46pm |
|
Well, judging by the little response to my post in the thread, I assume that ppl in my position have to simply rely on the pleasures of internet radio, and the occasional free offer...If one is going to be strict with not allowing sharing or downloading of music, they should at least ensure that other ppl in other parts of the world can legally access them.
|
|
In the process of perfecting the art of being who God wants me to be...
|
IP Logged |
|
KingofPolyester
Newbie
Joined: June-05-2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 62
|
 Posted: Nov-17-2009 at 10:30pm |
|
Does anyone remember a time before music could be downloaded at all? I remember a time not too long ago when I was a kid running to the radio to try and tape the song "shine" so I didn't have to wait until the radio played it. I guess that was illegal too...
|
|
"Maybe redemption is stories to tell."
|
IP Logged |
|
guitargeekette
Jesus Freak
Joined: Jan-05-2008
Location: Jamaica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 607
|
 Posted: Nov-18-2009 at 12:02am |
Originally posted by KingofPolyester
Does anyone remember a time before music could be downloaded at all? I remember a time not too long ago when I was a kid running to the radio to try and tape the song "shine" so I didn't have to wait until the radio played it.
Oh dude...I definitely remember those days lol. CDs weren't that popular yet, it was all about cassettes and they were like really expensive back then. I was a child and my parents were not about to spend that much for a cassette for a 5/6/7/8 yr old kid. And I used to have my mixed tapes with various recordings from the radio...especially when it was the Dove Award time of yr and our local radio station would play Contemporary Christian Music for a span of 2 weeks leading up to the Doves (I wouldn't hear CCM again until the next year LOL literally)...*sigh*...
Originally posted by KingofPolyester
I guess that was illegal too...
|
|
In the process of perfecting the art of being who God wants me to be...
|
IP Logged |
|
KingofPolyester
Newbie
Joined: June-05-2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 62
|
 Posted: Nov-18-2009 at 12:22am |
Originally posted by UnderOathFreak
And I'm not gonna apologize for my other post, because that's exactly how I feel. It wasn't aimed at any one individual, more at the mindset of some of the people on here as a whole...
If that's how you feel, that's how you feel. I found it to be rude and condescending, even if you aim it at no one in particular; it offended me. Not so much that you vented how you felt, but the way you did it, and the lack of remorse, which puts you in a bit of a situation since you want to talk about breaking laws and rules so much. "Love one another...", "Speak the truth in love" etc.
|
|
"Maybe redemption is stories to tell."
|
IP Logged |
|
UnderOathFreak
Groupie
Joined: Jan-23-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 348
|
 Posted: Nov-18-2009 at 9:30am |
Originally posted by KingofPolyester
If that's how you feel, that's how you feel. I found it to be rude and condescending, even if you aim it at no one in particular; it offended me. Not so much that you vented how you felt, but the way you did it, and the lack of remorse, which puts you in a bit of a situation since you want to talk about breaking laws and rules so much. "Love one another...", "Speak the truth in love" etc.
Remorse: "Deep and painful regret for wrongdoing, moral anguish arising from repentance for past misdeeds; bitter regret." So why should I be remorseful? It was a passing comment, you took it the wrong way, not my problem.
And about those Biblical laws. People who throw thow those around and scream stop pointing out what I'm doing wrong you hypocrite, only say that because their arguement has been shot down.
In the end, you may heed any word on here, that's cool, alot of people burn cds and illegally download. We're just trying to help you realize our opinion, which is backed up by stinkin Federal Law....have a blessed day
|
|
"Nothing Stands Between A Man And His Maker"~The Eleventh Hour~August Burns Red
|
IP Logged |
|
GlorytoGod
Administrator
Joined: Apr-28-2003
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3338
|
 Posted: Nov-18-2009 at 12:54pm |
|
Hi guys,
This is a hot topic; it's a very passionate and important subject for me personally, and I enjoy reading about it and discussing it. I really hope I've stopped short of hurting someone's feelings or embarrassing anyone; it's my goal to always be compassionate and loving, and to honor my Lord and Savior in my words, thoughts, and actions. Since this is a community where (mostly) Christians gather, I'd sincerely hope the same thing applies for every one of us here. Remember the written word is a two-dimensional medium and can sometimes be misconstrued. It's no one's fault, per sé, but if a brother or sister in Christ says, "Hey, your comments hurt me.", then I should think it would be important to clear that up.
Having said that, let's remain respectful here, please. Like I said, it's a hot topic with even some followers of Christ clearly divided on this issue.
Thanks.
|
|
Lord, let others see You before they see me.
Note: To e-mail me please use the Contact Form on my "Staff" page (Karen M.) at the bottom of this page (scroll down).
|
IP Logged |
|
llamalima
Jesus Freak
Joined: Jan-24-2007
Location: New Zealand
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 780
|
 Posted: Nov-18-2009 at 2:59pm |
|
Alright i thought I would share what I do. Sure, i used to download albums illegally, I would always tell myself that i would buy the cd afterwards. The reality is that I never would. I agree with Karen that it is justifying the sin of it all.
Nevertheless, what i do is I sell second hand cds. I buy them off Ebay or from suppliers and i sell them again for profit. I rip the cd onto the computer inbetween, and as far as i am concerned i don't feel the guilt. I did own the cd inbetween the purchase and sale. Anyway, that's what i do.
Wait, it's illegal to record the radio...? Crap. =(
|
we will wear compassion
we will wear it on our chests
and sing with love at our throats
like a child, it's all I know
Xanga blog...
|
IP Logged |
|
KingofPolyester
Newbie
Joined: June-05-2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 62
|
 Posted: Nov-18-2009 at 4:35pm |
Originally posted by UnderOathFreak
Originally posted by KingofPolyester
If that's how you feel, that's how you feel. I found it to be rude and condescending, even if you aim it at no one in particular; it offended me. Not so much that you vented how you felt, but the way you did it, and the lack of remorse, which puts you in a bit of a situation since you want to talk about breaking laws and rules so much. "Love one another...", "Speak the truth in love" etc.
Remorse: "Deep and painful regret for wrongdoing, moral anguish arising from repentance for past misdeeds; bitter regret." So why should I be remorseful? It was a passing comment, you took it the wrong way, not my problem.
And about those Biblical laws. People who throw thow those around and scream stop pointing out what I'm doing wrong you hypocrite, only say that because their arguement has been shot down.
In the end, you may heed any word on here, that's cool, alot of people burn cds and illegally download. We're just trying to help you realize our opinion, which is backed up by stinkin Federal Law....have a blessed day 
Well, by your own admission you don't care how some one may have taken your comment, saying it's not your problem, but since we are pointing out wrongdoing here...your dead wrong about that. I expressed offense at your comment as well as your tone which continues to be of the condescending nature. That offends me and you wouldn't know that unless I told you, so I did.
I admit that I am still struggling with the mix cds being illegal. Why take all the joy out of making that perfect mix for a friend to lift up their day? Still working through that one.(the bigwigs discovered that money was to be made from the single downlaod and the rest is history I suppose) I understand and agree that downloading an album you didn't buy from the internet or the library is illegal. Many of my comments were made in jest as a sort of devils advocate and for that I am sorry to have put any flame on an already hot issue. I hope you realize I wasn't intending to be argumentative but only genuinely seeking to work through this. Your response kinda threw me off, and I felt I should atleast find out if you meant it the way it sounded, which you've confirmed that you did.
I do think that we should be able to discuss topics like this in a civil manner and hope to continue to be able to in the future. Please keep in mind though as you come to a thread like this, and as you respond to me and others in this thread in the manner that you have, that you could/will push people further in the opposite direction. Speaking the truth in love is a hard thing to do I realize because the truth hurts and offends the offender, but if we are going to err, we should err in love don't you think?
|
|
"Maybe redemption is stories to tell."
|
IP Logged |
|
Dan C
Newbie
Joined: Nov-13-2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 19
|
 Posted: Nov-18-2009 at 5:21pm |
Originally posted by KingofPolyester
Speaking the truth in love is a hard thing to do I realize because the truth hurts and offends the offender, but if we are going to err, we should err in love don't you think? Yes. Failing to share the truth with love is often followed by undesirable results. Think of approaching a unbeliever and screaming: "Hey you! Yeah, I'm talking to you, you dirty rotten sinner! You're going to burn in Hell for eternity!" Most likely the unbeliever will not respond very well to these words. A condescending approach is not a very good tactic either. It's talking down to someone; who like's being talked down to? Besides, talking down to someone doesn't make sense. How can we talk down to someone were not above? We are all just sinner's saved by grace, no better then them in God's eyes. Sharing the truth in love and with respect for the other person, is how I believe, God would want us to share it.
|
IP Logged |
|
joenater96
Newbie
Joined: Aug-28-2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 90
|
 Posted: Nov-18-2009 at 8:01pm |
|
I can see why burning CDs would be illegal, but to me it is often beneficial to the artist. For example, if you're burning a CD for a friend, if they like it, often times they'll buy it anyway, and the artist WILL get money for it, and if they don't, they wouldn't have bought the CD anyway so it doesn't really hurt the artist. Most of the money from CD sales goes to the label, not the artists, anyways, so its the congolmerates and big labels getting most of the money from the sales and I could care less if they are ten dollars less rich because of it.
That may have come out wrong, but it's how I feel about it most of the time. Most of the mix CDs my friends have given me have tracks from artists that I normally wouldn't buy albums from anyway, so it doesn't seem to be hurting them that much. I know it's still somewhat wrong, but in some ways its only hurting the labels.
|
|
"Beautiful bride, body of Christ, one flesh abiding strong and unifying" -Flyleaf
|
IP Logged |
|
crosstheway
Groupie
Joined: June-15-2009
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 115
|
 Posted: Nov-18-2009 at 8:19pm |
|
I want to point out that the laws regarding copyright are international, which means that it doesn't matter where you are or where the artists come from, the law still applies.
The Law says it is stealing to copy or download a cd illegally, or to keep an electronic copy of the music once the cd is no longer in your possession. Romans 13 v1 states "Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God."
Exodus 20v15, Leviticus 19v11, Deutoronomy 5v19 all say do not steal.
So is it really the label your hurting, or the artist, or are you hurting God?
|
|
|
IP Logged |
|
UnderOathFreak
Groupie
Joined: Jan-23-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 348
|
 Posted: Nov-18-2009 at 9:34pm |
Originally posted by joenater96
I can see why burning CDs would be illegal, but to me it is often beneficial to the artist. For example, if you're burning a CD for a friend, if they like it, often times they'll buy it anyway, and the artist WILL get money for it, and if they don't, they wouldn't have bought the CD anyway so it doesn't really hurt the artist. Most of the money from CD sales goes to the label, not the artists, anyways, so its the congolmerates and big labels getting most of the money from the sales and I could care less if they are ten dollars less rich because of it.
That may have come out wrong, but it's how I feel about it most of the time. Most of the mix CDs my friends have given me have tracks from artists that I normally wouldn't buy albums from anyway, so it doesn't seem to be hurting them that much. I know it's still somewhat wrong, but in some ways its only hurting the labels.
Haha, I had this same conversation with a friend the other day. Those big bad record labels are en-titled to the money. Just because they may not necessarily need it, they still have the right to it. Burning cds for other people is still wrong. The rich get richer, it's the way it is sometimes. No one has the right to manufacture something for another person's use, when that item is under copyright.
|
|
"Nothing Stands Between A Man And His Maker"~The Eleventh Hour~August Burns Red
|
IP Logged |
|
joenater96
Newbie
Joined: Aug-28-2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 90
|
 Posted: Nov-20-2009 at 7:05pm |
|
I plan on buying most of my burned CDs eventually, because I support those bands and want the actual CD and booklet. I'm not arguing with you, I know its a law and everything, but right now I don't feel like I'm at a place to face the facts right now.
|
|
"Beautiful bride, body of Christ, one flesh abiding strong and unifying" -Flyleaf
|
IP Logged |
|
GlorytoGod
Administrator
Joined: Apr-28-2003
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3338
|
 Posted: Nov-20-2009 at 7:29pm |
Originally posted by joenater96
...but right now I don't feel like I'm at a place to face the facts right now.
Curious to know why that is? We don't need the details of course, but every person who calls himself a follower of Christ is fully accountable to Him at all times, correct? We want to walk in obedience to Him always. If you are going through a difficult time in your life right now, allow God to come in and help you through it. However, no offense but I can't see that it is an excuse not to be in the will of God, or not do what is right - morally, ethically, legally, and spiritually.
|
|
Lord, let others see You before they see me.
Note: To e-mail me please use the Contact Form on my "Staff" page (Karen M.) at the bottom of this page (scroll down).
|
IP Logged |
|
JF022393
Jesus Freak
Joined: Jan-24-2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1367
|
 Posted: Nov-20-2009 at 8:31pm |
Originally posted by piano89
^^ Unfortunately you do- "As required by our Digital Content providers, Digital Content will,
unless otherwise designated, be available only to customers located in
the United States."I think it has to do with copyright laws in other countries, or lack there of.That really sucks man. Wish I could help you out but I don't know of any places.
Ah, my bad then.
|
IP Logged |
|
Chosenone
Groupie
Joined: July-24-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 100
|
 Posted: Nov-20-2009 at 9:34pm |
|
I just read an article regarding illegal downloading and how it is actually helping music sales. I guess there was a survey done in November. According to the survey it found out that those who admitted that they illegaly downloaded music actually spent around $128 a year on music. That is compared to about $55 for those who claimed they never illegally downloaded music. It was pretty intresting. I'm not for it or anything but it's just another way of looking at it. Seems that those who do the downloading illegally are doing it to determine if an album is good. I think it would benefit bands and labels more if more of them put up album streams on thier websites or like right here on JFH for christian music. I would post the link for the article but I found it on a secular music web page.
|
|
Beyond the dark horizon
Out where the people are crying
a Morningstar will be rising
rising to show us the way-
Whiteheart
|
IP Logged |
|
tkybndqtip
Jesus Freak
Joined: Sep-25-2003
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1599
|
 Posted: Nov-20-2009 at 11:58pm |
|
Those statistics don't necessarily lead to that conclusion. It could be that those who spend $128 a year on music love music more in general, so they buy more as well as download some. Those who spend $55 a year might be more likely to just buy a cd at walmart here and there.
|
|
"You want to know the difference between us...
You've got to know the One who lives in me" - Kutless
"Come now, lets settle this..."-God (Isaiah 1:18)
AIM/Yahoo-tkybndqtip
|
IP Logged |
|
Chosenone
Groupie
Joined: July-24-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 100
|
 Posted: Yesterday at 12:52am |
|
True but all it was saying is that even thou people are downloading music illegaly are still buying cd's. Which then disproves the music industries theory that downloading is hurting music sales.
|
|
Beyond the dark horizon
Out where the people are crying
a Morningstar will be rising
rising to show us the way-
Whiteheart
|
IP Logged |
|
guitargeekette
Jesus Freak
Joined: Jan-05-2008
Location: Jamaica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 607
|
 Posted: Yesterday at 4:00am |
Originally posted by Chosenone
True but all it was saying is that even thou people are downloading music illegaly are still buying cd's. Which then disproves the music industries theory that downloading is hurting music sales.
It's funny you should say that because as bad as the record companies try to make it sound, I somehow knew that the downloads never crippled sales as much as they say it does.
Nonetheless, it still doesn't make it right to download music illegally. If for nothing else, for the principle. (I still think they need to make an effort to get the music in other parts of the world though. It's not fair to those of us who love the music and have no way to get it). I was told that some artistes place their music and promo material on file sharing sites for increasing popularity. Is that true, and if it is, it it wrong then, since the artiste actually put it up there?
|
|
In the process of perfecting the art of being who God wants me to be...
|
IP Logged |
|
Chosenone
Groupie
Joined: July-24-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 100
|
 Posted: Yesterday at 12:40pm |
|
I don't know who puts the music up on these sites but I would think it would be someone at the company or affiliated with the band. I still think one of the things more labels should do is allow more album streams. Here at JFH they only play 30 second clips which sometimes isn't enough to entice someone to buy an album. Now if a whole album was put up to listen then it could be a better barometer. I know another site I frequent puts up streams of more independant bands and it helps me determine if it is worth buying or not.
|
|
Beyond the dark horizon
Out where the people are crying
a Morningstar will be rising
rising to show us the way-
Whiteheart
|
IP Logged |
|
The Rescued
Groupie
Joined: Jan-30-2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 129
|
 Posted: Yesterday at 3:22pm |
Originally posted by Chosenone
True but all it was saying is that even thou people are downloading music illegaly are still buying cd's. Which then disproves the music industries theory that downloading is hurting music sales.
I find this argument to be ridiculous. It seems to me that a lot of you keep coming up with excuses in an attempt to somehow justify stealing.
Let me use an analogy. Your friend tells you that they're going to steal a pizza. He tells you that he wants to find out if he likes it or not. If he does, he says he might buy one the next time. I don't think that anybody would support his actions. Yet, using the same logic that you use concerning illegal downloading, his actions are A-OK.
|
|
RAWR!
|
IP Logged |
|
tkybndqtip
Jesus Freak
Joined: Sep-25-2003
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1599
|
 Posted: Yesterday at 3:41pm |
Originally posted by Chosenone
True but all it was saying is that even thou people are downloading music illegaly are still buying cd's. Which then disproves the music industries theory that downloading is hurting music sales.
Once again, that disproves no such thing. The music enthusiast who spends $128 dollars per year would do one of two things if he didn't download illegal music.
1. Not spend anymore on music than he already does
and therefore not obtain any more music than $128
will buy.
2. Pay for the songs he would have downloaded
illegally and spend more than he already does
on music.
The person who downloads illegal music can not have a positive effect on music sales and plausibly might not do anything at all, but for the most part it will hurt music sales.
Let's say half the people who buy legal music only will spend an additional $20 per year, and half will not spend more than they already do. That's an average of $10 loss to record companies per person per year. Clearly, downloading illegal music can only hurt music sales.
|
|
"You want to know the difference between us...
You've got to know the One who lives in me" - Kutless
"Come now, lets settle this..."-God (Isaiah 1:18)
AIM/Yahoo-tkybndqtip
|
IP Logged |
|
Chosenone
Groupie
Joined: July-24-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 100
|
 Posted: Yesterday at 5:38pm |
|
I am not an advocate of illegally downloading music. In fact I think it is wrong and if people get caught doing it then, they should face the fines. I was merely pointing out a recent survey that was taken. Stealing is Stealing. My main point was about the album streams. I think it could possibly be a good way to deter someone from illegally downloading. It's illegal,don't do it.
|
|
Beyond the dark horizon
Out where the people are crying
a Morningstar will be rising
rising to show us the way-
Whiteheart
|
IP Logged |
|
Wildcat
Newbie
Joined: Dec-11-2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 39
|
 Posted: Yesterday at 5:46pm |
|
^^^^^
A good number of bands have full album streams on Myspace.
|
IP Logged |
|
-Apollyon-
Jesus Freak
Joined: Nov-17-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 660
|
 Posted: Today at 2:20am |
Originally posted by joenater96
I can see why burning CDs would be illegal, but to me it is often beneficial to the artist. For example, if you're burning a CD for a friend, if they like it, often times they'll buy it anyway, and the artist WILL get money for it, and if they don't, they wouldn't have bought the CD anyway so it doesn't really hurt the artist. Most of the money from CD sales goes to the label, not the artists, anyways, so its the congolmerates and big labels getting most of the money from the sales and I could care less if they are ten dollars less rich because of it.
That may have come out wrong, but it's how I feel about it most of the time. Most of the mix CDs my friends have given me have tracks from artists that I normally wouldn't buy albums from anyway, so it doesn't seem to be hurting them that much. I know it's still somewhat wrong, but in some ways its only hurting the labels.
With all due respect, this entire post disgusts me. First of all, I'm sick of the argument that burning CD's is somehow beneficial because the people often end up buying the CD anyway. First of all, OFTEN, not ALWAYS, is the key word. Second of all, beneficial or not, it's still ILLEGAL. Please look the word up.
And that last sentence. So first of all, you know it's wrong, but you're ok with that? And second of all, you admit that it's hurting the labels, and you're ok with that? I'm sorry dude, but being ok with ripping people off is low. Just because the label is big doesn't mean they aren't entitled to their money. I'm sorry but there is no logic anywhere in this post.
So you tell me: how big does my company have to get for stealing from me to become legal?
This is not me ripping on anyone. This is me upset at people committing and supporting criminal actions.
|
|
|
IP Logged |
|