The League members are staunch individualists, outcasts in fact, with checkered pasts and singular gifts that have been both blessing and curse. Now they must learn to trust each other and work as a team for the very hope of civilization. With little preparation and no time to lose, they will be transported via Captain Nemo’s extraordinary submarine, the Nautilus, to the frontline of defense: Venice, Italy. There, a masked madman known as the Fantom plans to sabotage a conference of world leaders by setting off a domino chain of explosions, sinking the entire city. The threat is catastrophic, the risks are staggering. The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen has 9 hours to save the world…
Almost as Daredevil did earlier this year, The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (or LXG) is less of your light-hearted superhero fanfare and more of the gritty, dark action adults might go for. But just as Daredevil suffered from problems from every aspect, LXG does so as well.
What LXG has going for it are the characters, big visuals, and, of course, Sean Connery. But the film suffers most from poor editing. I felt the story was engaging enough although rather basic and, at times, kind of hard to follow. But the League of characters were interesting ones. Each character had a past and were nothing short of outcasts so it made their developments interesting to watch. Toss in some classic "Who can you trust?" twists, a hearty helping of tasty visuals and you've got an entertaining comic book adaptation.
But the tourniquet around the neck of this project was the editing. In the first real all-out action sequence involving the newly-formed League, the splicing of shots involving the characters is cut so ridiculously bad, you truly will not know what you're watching. The camera barely stays on a character long enough to allow you to figure out who is swinging their fists before your tossed to another shoddy encounter. The end result? A complete mess of an action scene that had all the potential of being nothing short of exciting is reduced to steaming pile of ashes. Aside from that, other sequences happen so quickly you barely know what it is you're watching or why the characters are doing what they're doing. But when the film does slow down from time to time to allow the viewer a chance to get to know some characters, that's when you really feel like you're being offered a movie -- not a mess of randomly spliced pieces of filmstrip.
In the content department, LXG is heavy on the violence. Probably the roughest moment is when we're introduced to Mina's vampire ways and she violently attacks a man and kills him via a bloody bite to the neck. Aside from that, we experience some pretty disturbingly gross shots of Jekyll turning into and back from Mr. Hyde, not to mention the overall creepiness of Hyde's character, and a brief effects shot of a character's face decomposing rapidly (ironically like in one of Connery's classic films Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade). Language is minimal and sexual content is reduced to merely a minor comment and a kiss.
So after all these complaints, why bother with even three stars? Connery saved this film for me. I've enjoyed his films since I was a kid and saw him in The Hunt For Red October and The Last Crusade (yeah, okay, I'm 23, so I wasn't schooled in Connery's early work will I got older!). Connery didn't act an Oscar-winning performance but it sufficed and was fun enough to make this film watchable. Other notable characters were Townsend's suave Dorian Gray, Jason Flemyng's schizophrenic Dr. Jekyll, Naseeruddin Shah's unique take on Captain Nemo, and Shane West's Tom Sawyer. The special effects were impressive. The scenery was often beautiful and intriguing. I also enjoyed watching the characters interact with each other. Sort of like a poor man's X-Men (or more like a classic monster movie version), LXG was just an all-around different kind of film. So while the flaws were pretty evident, the overall movie was still intriguing enough for me to enjoy it.
All in all, I thought the movie wasn't all that bad. It was - in a lot of ways - incredibly flawed but I found a lot of those flaws forgivable for the most part. This is not a film for the youngsters by any means so if you must see them, please leave them at home. So while LXG is entertaining, your summer will not be incomplete if you miss this one. If you have to see only one or two movies this summer, make sure it's Pirates of the Caribbean, Finding Nemo, or Bruce Almighty.- John DiBiase (reviewed: 7/16/03)
Disclaimer: All reviews are based solely on the opinions of the reviewer. Most reviews are rated on how the reviewer enjoyed the film overall, not exclusively on content. However, if the content really affects the reviewer's opinion and experience of the film, it will definitely affect the reviewer's overall rating.
|Tori Kelly Sets Record with Her Chart-Topping New Project, "Hiding Place"|
Tue 25 Sep 2018 20:20:00 EST
|Fit For A King's "Dark Skies" Debuts No. 2 on Billboard Hard Rock Charts|
Tue 25 Sep 2018 12:10:00 EST
|Meredith Andrews To Record Live Worship Album In Nashville Sept. 26|
Mon 24 Sep 2018 23:00:00 EST
|Lauren Daigle Announces "The Behold Christmas Tour"|
Mon 24 Sep 2018 12:10:00 EST
|Switchfoot Teases New Music As They Announce "Hiatus Is Over"|
Fri 21 Sep 2018 21:30:00 EST
|TobyMac's Popular "HITS DEEP Tour" To Hit 34 Arenas With 2019 Return|
Fri 21 Sep 2018 20:40:00 EST